Varuna's Umbrella Prince Meghaváhana could “Walk on Water” Under
Varuna’s Umbrella 7th Lecture in the “Tolerant God” Series (As
Researched and Experienced by Dr. Bob Holt, MD)
Matthew 12:22 “Then was brought unto him [Jesus, Meghaváhana, Yuzu Asaph, Saint Issa] one
possessed with a devil [a believer in Jehovah, perhaps a Pharisee, perhaps
Matthew himself, a Sadducee], blind, and dumb: and he healed him, insomuch
that the blind and dumb both spake and saw.”
In our last lecture we demonstrated that such a
statement could have other meanings besides the obvious meaning of a literal
miracle. Religious
blindness, and inability to speak the truth can also qualify as the correct
meaning.
Matthew 12:23 “And all the people were amazed, and said, Is not this the son of
David?”
Here
on the first level of meaning, this can be paraphrased, “Is not this just
an ordinary man of the lineage of King David?” [How then can he perform
such miracles?] On the second level, that of “Gospel Pesher”,
the meaning is that Jesus is the Essene Messiah, eligible to be king because he
was of the proven lineage of David. And
Matthew in chapter one of his gospel gives his version of this proof, beginning
with verse one. Matthew 1:1 “The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.”
On
the third level of “Bible Codes”, which I have called “Beyond
Gospel Pesher”, which demonstrates that Jesus lived at Taxila, in
Pakistan, the relationship of Jesus to David, and that he was of Jewish
descent, is still very important.
Even more important because Jesus was never declared to be a
“god” in India, Pakistan, and Kashmir as he was in the Western Word in
the time of Constantine the Great [4th century AD].
Indeed it is the most important fact about him in the book Kings of Kashmira. As
Prince Meghaváhana, he was
related to a former Kashmir ruler named Yudhishthira [Jewish, Judah] who we
can determine was indeed of the line of King David [through David’s son
Nathan].
Luke 3:23 “And Jesus himself began to be about thirty
years of age, being, (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son
of Heli, ---- 31 Which was the son of Melea, which was the son
of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha, which was the son of Nathan,
which was the son of David---“
By going back to read the Old Testament story of King David, and all his
wives, it is possible to determine that David had more than one surviving
child with Bathsheba, his last and possibly favorite wife.
He began his relationship with Bathsheba after watching her take a
bath in her back yard, and knowing her to be married to Uriah the Hittite,
one of his soldiers, he committed adultery with her.
When she told David she was pregnant, David tried to get her husband to sleep with
her, so Uriah could claim the child.
When this plan failed, David arranged for Uriah to die in battle,
then married the pregnant Bathsheba.
That first child died as an infant, but Bathsheba went on to bear
David more children, of which two were Solomon, who succeeded David
and King, and Nathan. As
the result of my discovery of Jesus’ Kashmir historic beginnings, I am
proposing that Yudisthira, a former king of Kashmir, was a descendent of
King David’s son Nathan, and that this is the reason that Luke is able to
give us the genealogy resented in Luke chapter 3.
Jewish genealogies were kept in the temple in Jerusalem.
Many were destroyed during the repeated attacks on Jerusalem by
foreign invaders, so it was a great advantage to the family of Joseph, the
father of Jesus, that his genealogy was preserved all the way back to Nathan
and King David in Kashmir. A
land that was not subject to the repeated attacks that Israel and Jerusalem
had been subject to.
“Kings of Kashmira,” page
33.”Godpaditya,
the king of Gandhara, in the hope of conquering Kashmira, had given shelter
to the great grand-son of Yudhishthira.
This exiled prince had a son named Meghaváhana, whom his father sent to the country of East Yotisha to be present at
the Sayamvara marriage of the daughter of its king who was a Vishnuvite; and
he had the fortune of being selected as the husband of the princess.
He was also presented with an UMBRELLA, which was got from VARUNA by
king Naraka and which CAST ITS SHADE ON NONE BUT A PARAMOUNT KING.
This connection gave him some importance in the eyes of the people
who believed that he would one day rise to power.
And after his return with his wife to his father, the ministers of
Kashmira invited him to accept the septre of their country, he being the
descendent of their ancient king. ---“ Page 36 “After the resignation and retirement of the late king (Sandhimati), the ministers who presided over the council of the people, went to Gandhara, and brought with them the renowned Meghaváhana, whom they crowned king; and who afterwards proved to be a good and kind-hearted sovereign; and the expectations that were entertained of him were fully realized.
His tenderness for animal life was even greater than that of a
Buddhist high priest. He
FORBADE THE SLAUGHTER OF ANIMALS in his kingdom, and as compensation to the
hunters who lived by killing animals, he paid them money.--- “This
prince led an expedition to compel other kings to DESIST FROM KILLING
ANIMALS; and carried his arms to the sea, and even to Ceylon, making the
subdued kings promise not to KILL ANIMALS.” “We
are ashamed to relate the history of this GOOD KING to vulgar men--- The
king died after a reign of thirty four years.’ Meghaváhana,
who “Walked on Water”
“Kings of Kashmira”
APPENDIX D
Page vi
“The stories that are related of King
Meghaváhana, are as
follows: -- One day when he was walking, he heard a cry near him of “thief
thief,” and he also heard the voice of weeping. “Who is there, kill the thief,” said the king in anger;
after which the crying ceased, but he saw not the thief. Two or three days after when he went out to ride,
some two or three beautiful women came to him for help.
The kind-hearted king stopped his horse, and heard what they had to
say. They made their
obeisance and said; “O merciful king!
Since thou hast begun to reign, who shall fear the oppression of
other men? Once, when the
sky was covered with clouds, and the peasants were afraid of a hail storm
and anxious to protect their fields of ripened corn, they got angry with the
Nagas who were our husbands and raised the cry of ‘thief’.
You heard it and ordered
that they should be killed, and they were bound with ropes. Now have mercy on us and on them.” The king smiled and ordered them to be released.
The Nagas, thus freed, bowed to the king and went away with their
wives.”
NOTE BY DR. ROBERT F. HOLT, MD:
Here one must understand who the “Nagas” were.
They were the “Nature Gods” that reigned over the primitive
peoples of Kashmir before the Elohim took over.
The CLUES here are Numerology
and Astrology.
The cry of
‘thief thief” stands for 2000 years, two millenniums.
The “Nagas” or “Nature Gods” were bound with ropes for 2000
years, an entire “Age”. Specifically
the “Age of Pisces”. Jesus
set them free again in the “Age of Aquarius”.
Another CLUE that the “Age of Pisces” is indicated is the WEEPING
OF THE WOMEN. During the
“Age of Pisces” women had no rights, even in the Christian Church.
Saint Paul began the suppression, and priests and popes have carried
it on. And in the Muslim
world it has been even more severe.
But Jesus Christ in this first story heard
the pleas of the women, freed them to live with their husbands (the
Nature Gods) once more. “New
Age” freedom of religion.
Appendix D
Page vi. “It is related that
in an expedition which this king led against others, he meditated when his soldiers were sleeping at ease under the palm trees, how he could
conquer the island before him.”
NOTE BY DR. ROBERT F. HOLT, MD:
“Here the scene is reminiscent of Jesus Christ in the Garden of
Gethsemane, sweating blood while his disciples slept.
What Jesus was about to “conquer” was the
future. To “save”
mankind by his crucifixion. Thus
armed with this similarity, we can understand the issues in this Indian
story. “While thus thinking, he heard a cry from the seaside forest exclaiming ‘Even in the reign of Meghaváhana this man is killed.’ Grieved to hear this the king went to the spot taking with him an umbrella; and there he saw a hunter chief killing a man before the temple of Chandi.”
NOTE BY DR. ROBERT F. HOLT, MD: “Taking with him an umbrella”
signifies TIME/SPACE travel. Into
the past first. What is
described is the sacrifice by Abraham of Isaac (or Ishmael in the Muslim
version of the story). Chianti
is here Jehovah or Allah.
“‘Fie on your wicked act,’ said the king to the hunter,’ you
do not know what may betide you.’”
NOTE BY DR. ROBERT F. HOLT, MD: Here Meghavahana, as Jesus Christ, is
echoing the Essene aversion to
killing animals as well as humans. They
refused to take part in the temple sacrifices at Herod’s temple in
Jerusalem. Not only this,
but Jesus is forecasting that this whole “Favoritism towards Isaac scene” will
cost the Jews dearly later on. Which
it has!
“The hunter became afraid,
and replied that his child was lying at the point of death, and aheavenly
voice had proclaimed that if he sacrificed the man before the shrine of
Chandi his child would be saved.”
NOTE: Here we have the long period of Temple Sacrifices up until
Herod’s Temple was destroyed, The TIME/SPACE umbrella has carried Meghaváhana-Jesus far beyond his time to 70-73 AD. Supposedly Jesus died
in 33 AD and Meghaváhana
died in 59 AD. The temple
was not destroyed until 70 AD.
“For a long time he offered
no sacrifice, and hence his child was dying, and his many friends also would
die, for the child was the life for all.
‘You protect the helpless, and why do you not protect the child
whose death many will lament.’
When the king heard the
words of the hunter and looked on the suppliant look of the man who was
being sacrificed, he thus said ‘Hear O! hunter, I will protect both you
and your child and its many friends, as also this friendless man.
Here I offer myself a sacrifice before the goddess, kill me without
fear, and let them both live.”
NOTE: The “long time” with “no sacrifice” is the 1850+ years
that the temple was destroyed and the Jews were banned from Jerusalem. Finally, in 1948 they again had a homeland in Israel.
Meanwhile, Christ’s ‘death” protected both the man that was
supposed to be sacrificed and the child that would otherwise die.
The “child that was dying” is the age-old Jewish hope
for a Messiah to save them. Jesus
did not save them, but “saved” the Gentiles.
The many others, the child’s friends, that will die if the child
dies, are the Jews who died in the Jewish
holocaust. The
“friendless man” is the Gentile world. “Astonished at this great self-sacrifice of the king, the hunter replied ‘ your mercy, O! king, has got the better of your reason; why should you disregard your valuable life which should be saved at the cost of the three worlds? Kings should not care for pride or fame or virtue or wealth or friends or wives or sons when their own life is in danger. Therefore have no mercy on this man. If you live, your subjects as well as my son will live.”
NOTE: This betrays the real truth of the situation.
Obviously Jesus did not die in 33 AD, or was resuscitated, or he
could not have ruled as King Meghaváhana
of Kashmir until 59 AD, 26 years after his supposed death in Judea in the
spring of 33 AD!
“To this the king who was willing to offer himself a sacrifice thus
replied; ‘What do you know of justice, you who dwell in the forests; the
inhabitants of the deserts know not the pleasure of bathing in the
Ganges.”
NOTE: “You who dwell in the forests” signifies Europeans (France,
Germany, Great Britain), and the later “New World” of the Americas.
The “inhabitants of the deserts” are the Essenes in the
Wilderness of Judea. Those who
know the pleasure of bathing in the Ganges are the Kasmiris and Indians. “Do you, O! fool, oppose my attempt to buy immortal glory with this mortal body?
NOTE: As with the reference to the “Garden of Gethsemane” prayer
of Jesus while his disciples slept, this refers to a Gospel story also.
That his disciples, and especially Peter counseled Jesus not to go to
Jerusalem and be crucified.
“Speak no more, if you feel
hesitation to strike me, cannot I do so with my own sword?’
Thus saying he drew his sword, and when he was at the point of
striking himself, his hand was stayed by a heavenly being, and his head was
crowned with flowers. And he
saw not the goddess nor the hunter nor the victim nor the child.”
NOTE: Jesus was not allowed to die, or even kill himself.
But his “punishment” or “sacrifice” was to watch his
disciples and children die, some of them by torture.
After this he was “crowned with flowers” in Kashmir.
Thus, as in the Abraham-Isaac scene that starts this story, God stays
the hand of the one who would sacrifice his son.
“A divine personage
introduced himself to the king as Varuna.
He said that the umbrella which stood over the king’s head was captured by the
king’s father-in-law named Rauma from his city in former times.
‘Without the umbrella,’ said Varuna,
‘our subjects are subjected to
endless dangers. Therefore,
before taking back this umbrella, I have tested your kindness, and this
magical show was my own creation.’
NOTE BY DR. ROBERT F. HOLT, MD: Here one needs a knowledge of the
Sumerian Gods, the Anunaki or Elohim, obtainable in English now in Zechariah
Sitchin’s many books (Avon). The
Anunaki used their spacecraft not only to maintain their superiority and
rule over primitive humans, but also to fight each other in wars (called the
“Wars of the Gods” by Sitchin, that went on for millennia.
Here it is made clear that “Varuna’s
Umbrella” refers to space-craft.
“The king then delivered the umbrella
to Varuna and also offered prayers to him, and said that ‘even the
kalpa tree was not equal to good beings.
For the tree gave blessings when asked, while the good gave benefits
unasked. If you had not asked for the umbrella for the
benefit of your subjects, but had taken it for your own use, your act would
not have been righteous. Charitable
men do not favor their dependents by halves, a tree gives shade as well as
fruits.” NOTE: Here is the only part of this long series of “stories” connected to King Meghaváhana that has no “Pesher” meaning. Traditional Indian proverbs, perhaps completely interjected by Kahlana. “Urged by my dependents I ask for some favor. With your favor I have conquered the whole earth, now advise me how I can cross the ocean to the island.’
NOTE: Here we are combining TIME/SPACE travel with Astrology. With “Varuna’s” help Jesus as King Meghaváhana has conquered the ancient world of Essene Judea and of India. And is destined to conquer the Roman Empire as well. Through Constantine and the Roman Catholic Church. Now he wants to conquer the “Age of Aquarius” across the “Sea” of the “Age of Pisces”..
“Then replied Varuna that ‘if you wish to cross
the sea I will make the water hard.’
The king acknowledged the favor when the god disappeared with the umbrella. On the next day, the king crossed
the hardened sea with his astonished army.”
NOTE: Here it is acknowledged that Jesus did, indeed, visit our time
at the end of the “Age of Pisces” and the beginning of the “Age of
Aquarius”. In
doing so he fulfilled his promise to Christians to “return at the End of
the Age” (John 14:1-3 and other texts) and also fulfilled the Messianic
promises to Israel in the Old Testament (May 1948 to 1967 and beyond).
The image of “walking on the
water” is used here to definitely identify Meghaváhana
as Jesus!
Appendix D Page viii.
“It is said that some time after he had forbidden the killing of
animals, a Brahmana took his dead son and came to the king’s door and
began to weep. He said
that as he had given no sacrifice to Durga who wanted some, his only son had
died of fever that day. ‘If
you do not save my son O! king! By permitting the sacrifice of a living
being I shall hold thee as the cause of the child’s death.
Say thou O! chief of men! If
there is no difference between the life of a Brahmana and that of a
beast.”
NOTE In this story, which repeats the Pesher meaning and symbolism of
the earlier story, at least lip service is paid to the ethical difficulties
of preserving animal lives when humans may suffer thereby.
“Those kings are dead, O! mother earth! Who killed even Rishis to
save Brahmanas.’ When
the Brahmanna had said these and other harsh words through grief, the king
thought that he had resolved not to kill animals, and asked himself if he
should not break his vow for the Brahmana.”
NOTE: Here other Indian traditions are cited in which men died to
save other men. Certainly
it makes more sense for an animal to die to save his son.
The Brahmana is here accusing Jesus of allowing the Brahmana’s son
to die so that Jesus could keep his own vow.
Thus Jesus would be responsible for the death of the Brahmana’s
son.
“‘But if he dies for me,’ he thought, ‘I shall be guilty of
greater sin, my mind is in doubt, nor can it choose either alternative, like
the flower which falls in the whirl-pool here many currents meet.
Therefore, by sacrificing myself, I shall satisfy Durga, I shall save
the life of the Brahmana and of his son, as well as keep my promise.’
NOTE: Here we are in a deeper quandary
than is apparent by a surface reading.
The deeper question is the apparent responsibility of God (or the
gods) for the evil things that happen on this earth.
Surely they have the power to intervene and alter history.
Why don’t they do this?
Part of the answer is attempted in the story (the flower caught in
the whirl-pool). Who
can tell, even of the “gods”, the outcome of such an intervention?
In this current “case”, if Jesus decides to overturn his rule
against killing animals to save this one person’s son, others will also
want the same rule to be over-ruled in their favor.
And after animals, men will be killed.
Wars, crime, and disease will again be rampant in Kashmir and India,
and soon it will be as if King Meghaváhana
had never been born or ruled. In
a word, Kashmir will no longer be “Heaven on Earth”.
“Thus determining he dismissed the Brahmana, promising to revive
his son the next day.
In the night, when the king was going to sacrifice himself, Durga
prevented him from so doing, and brought the Brahmana’s dead son to life
again.”
NOTE: Not only does this refer us once again to the many healings by
Jesus in the Gospels, (and raising ordinary people from the dead), but it
also leaves the question unanswered of how the “gods” can intervene or
change their rules without adversely affecting history.
Leaving the “ball in our court”.
Which, indeed, it really is!
A further symbolic meaning here is connected to “the
next day”. It is
“during the night” (the “Age of Pisces”) that Jesus’ sacrifice has
effect. The “next
day” (the “Age of Aquarius”) the Brahmana’s son (other traditional
religions besides Islam, Judaism, and Christianity) come to life again.
This story, and the “Pesher” interpretation of it here given by Dr. Robert F. Holt, MD, MPH is supported by a stone mural carving recently excavated by unknown excavators, then photographed by Sue Olsson in Phalgam, Kashmir late in 2001 or early in 2002. JESUS CHRIST as a devotee of LORD SHIVA |
||||||||||||||||
If you have read the above SUMMARY of the Kashmir traditions of LORD SHIVA and at least SOME of the eight topics with LINKS above, you MIGHT be ready for SOME or ALL of the TOPICS with links below (Definitely HERETICAL to most!)
|