On previous pages I have discussed some ideas popular in the early
Middle Ages in which Jesus was a "Divine Child" born to a
virgin mother in a burst of light who had no birth pains and was still
a virgin after this amazing birth. Christ as an all knowing God
(part of a Divine Trinity) merely reformed himself to look like a
human baby for a while.
In other
such stories, the Divine Child Jesus had the power to make birds out
of clay, then clap his hands, and they'd fly away. But when
other children crossed him, or upset him, he killed these children,
then reconsidered and brought them back to life so that his supposed family
could live in the community without persecution because of the monster
child in their family.
In Desire
of Ages, a late 19th century book about the "Perfect
Jesus," the only person on earth who never sinned by thought or
deed, his major problem as a child was his older "brothers"
(who were not really his brothers) who tempted him continuously.
In Norman Bull's Jesus of Nazareth, Jesus the carpenter had no
problem with his brothers, who were younger than he, teaching them the
carpenter trade so he could leave home to "save the world".
Then we looked closely at the Gospel of John and discovered evidence
in John's apparent lack of knowledge about how far it was from where
John the Baptist was baptizing near Jericho to Nazareth and Capernaum
and the Sea of Galilee, and accepted Norman Bull's suggestion that
John the Baptist was an Essene. John baptized Jesus as an Essene
also, but suggested he was to be a celibate "Lamb of God"
and never marry. But Jesus was in the Essene "Cana"
three days later getting betrothed to Mary Magdalene by a famous
leader of first-century Gnostics. However, all this occurred
after those "Silent Years" from 13 years old to 30 years
old. If Jesus was not, as Norman Bull presumes, with the help of
two questions in the gospels, engaged in the carpenter business, and
not, as John the Baptist suggests on two occasions, training to be a
life-long celibate monk at the Qumran monastery, then where else could
he have been? The answer to this question given in quite a
number of quotations in Near East sources is "traveling through
the world". Looking for the answers to life's big
questions from a lot of religious teachers other than YHWH, the Torah,
and the Dead Sea Scrolls. According to these sources,
Jesus started out at 13 years old to become the "King of
Travelers".
Starting
out at age 13 to travel to India, and discover for himself the answers
to life's big questions, Jesus, according to the researcher Fida
Hassnain, first lived with the Jains for a period of time and
assimilated a lot of what they taught about purification of the
soul by leading a pure life, through non-violence, noble actions
and thoughts, kindness to all beings, and a vegetarian diet. But
he didn't stay long, and moved on to the giant temple complex at
Jagannath, and then to the Ganges river and Varanasi, where he
stayed for six years, absorbing the history in the Vedas, and whatever
good teachings the Hindus had to offer. Disagreeing with the
Brahmans on caste distinctions, Jesus moved on to Kapilavastu in Nepal
and Hemis in Tibet, and
found more he could agree with in the Buddhist teachings of the monks
of Nepal and Tibet. Then he took the long road back to
Judea, where he was confronted again with the question that sent him traveling in
the first place. The question of "Who's your
Daddy?"
A
"Lamb of God"? OR a Descendent of
KING DAVID?
To John
the Baptist in 29 AD, it was clear enough that Jesus was illegitimate,
and worthy only to be at the most a levitical Cardinal assigned to
some Essene village granting absolution to those sorry for their sins
and willing to repent and do better. But Jesus had set his
sights on being accepted as being the Messiah of David that would lead
his people to victory over the Romans and restore the "Kingdom of
God" to the Jewish nation. He now knew who his
earthly father was, because he had reached Kashmir in his pilgrimage
and watched his father Joseph reigning there as Aryyraja, the
"White Rajah" of Kashmir. And Jesus himself, starting in 25
AD, when his father retired, had been accepted as King of
Kashmir, Based on his Davidic genealogy not on some real or
imagined connection to some "Father God".
"Enough already," thought Jesus, and he worked around John
the Baptist's illegitimacy objections by winning over Jonathan Annas,
the Essene high priest, to his way of thinking. He went to
the Essene equivalent of Cana of Galilee with Jonathan Annas'
blessing, and was betrothed to Mary Magdalene because now he had a
Davidic genealogy, and hopefully would get Mary pregnant with a son who
would someday be a Davidic Messiah in his stead.
Wrote Luke in chapter 3 of his Gospel:
Verse 23-31: "And Jesus himself
began to be about thirty years
of age, being (as was supposed) the son of
Joseph, which was the son
of Heli, which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi,
which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Janna, which was the
son of Joseph, which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of
Amos, which was the son of Naum, which was the son of Esli, which was
the son of Nagge, which was the son Maath, which was the son of
Mattathias, which was the son of Semei, which was the son of Joseph,
which was the son of Juda, which was the son of Joanna, which was the
son of Resa, which was the son of Zorobabel, which was the son of
Salathiel, which was the son of Neri, which was the son of Melchi,
which was the son of Addi, which was the son of Cosam, which was the
son of Elmodam, which was the son of Er, which was the son of Jose,
which was the son of Eliezer, which was the son of Jorim, which was
the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, which was the son of
Simeon, which was the son of Juda, which was the son of Joseph, which
was the son of Jonan, which was the son of Eliakim, which was the son
of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha,
which was the son of Nathan, which
was the son of David."
Here is my explanation for why Luke chose to give a much longer
genealogy for Jesus beginning with Nathan, another son of
king David with his favorite wife Bathsheba, not the much
shorter genealogy through Solomon, whose mother was also
Bathsheba. Matthew, a high priest, knew that this
shorter genealogy through Solomon had breaks, missing names, and
other deficiencies, but as a high priest could declare it valid
by reason of his authority as high priest.
Luke, however,
had another advantage. He, in my opinion, obtained this
genealogy from Jesus himself, certified and sealed, perhaps
because Jesus brought it with him on his return from his 12 year
pilgrimage to India. Having obtained a certified
copy of it from the records of the Kingdom of Kashmir, he took
great care of this record because it answered, once and for all,
the question of "Who's your daddy?"
Some
people, without doubt, are reading Luke 3:23 with its bracketed
"as was supposed" to mean that Jesus was NOT the son
of Joseph, but this is the type of statement that can mean the
exact OPPOSITE of that, and MOST ASSUREDLY could be substituted
for this second common and wholly legitimate meaning. My
preferred meaning? "And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years
of age, being MOST ASSUREDLY (without doubt) the son of Joseph,--"
-- which umpteen generations before was descended from Nathan
the son of King David. |
Whoever drew, painted, or pasted up this picture, possibly from other
pictures available to them has used a pose for Jesus here with a lamb
on his lap that is quite similar to his pose on a stone obelisk my
friend and frequent correspondent Suzanna Olsson found in Phalgam, a
suburb of Srinagar, Kashmir. I am as certain that what Sue
found is a picture of Jesus Christ as most would be that Jesus Christ
is represented above as sitting on the grass with Lord Kristna."
The cross on the arm of the throne Jesus is sitting on in Kashmir
makes the identity of Jesus even clearer than it would be otherwise.
The person who sat on this throne, the throne of Kashmir, before Jesus
did, was his father Joseph, but without the animals lined up round the
throne and the lamb on his lap. The identity of both these kings
is so obscured in the highly mythical Kashmir history book as to make it
a puzzle very difficult to solve. But by using
"Gospel Pesher" techniques I learned from Dr. Barbara Thiering,
PhD in Jesus and the Riddle of the Dead Sea Scrolls I was
indeed able to solve two riddles. The riddle of "Who
was Sandhimati?" And "Why was he
crucified?"
For Sandhimati could have also had a cross on the armrest of his
throne. Indeed the cross my have been put there during the
final part of Sandhimati's reign. He was crucified about 23 AD,
and Jesus, his son, began his reign 2 years later in 25 AD, so there was
time to do it. And it must have been a reminder from the word
"Go" to Jesus what fate might await him if he chose to go the
same route his father had gone.
Sandhimati
|
"In his book "A
Search for the Historical Jesus", Fida Hassnain
mentions the story of the crucifixion of Sandhimati (spelling it
Samdimati) but neglects to notice that Sandhimati is in
Kahlana's kings list as reigning from 22 BC to 25 AD.
Perhaps this chart is not in Hassnain's book. There are
several translations of Kahlana's book and not all the details
agree. Obvious also when we compare the crucifixion story
itself in Hassnain's book with my version of Kings of Kashmira.
This story is on page 192 and 193 of "A Search for
the Historical Jesus." |
Fida Hassnain, an honored scholar pictured on the right, remarks
on page 193, "The above account is curious because it is
the only recorded incident of crucifixion in the long history of
Kashmir. This account, recorded by Kalhana in about 1148
AD, proves that in the early twelfth century, there existed a
faded impression of a person having been put on a cross by the
king. |
|
Fida
Hassnain's degrees, honors, and books--Click Here
Fida Hassnain's translation of Kings of Kashmira, at least as
Hassnain is quoting it, seems to indicate this crucifixion took place
OUTSIDE of Kashmir, and that the crucified man, once resuscitated or
resurrected, was carried back to this area -- an important point.
My version of Kings of Kashmira gives the impression the whole
episode occurred in Kashmir in some sort of cemetery or desert place
there. It's an important difference, so I'll quote my book, then
refer to Hassnain's book afterward to consider this point.
The names of the participants are the same. A king who crucified
someone who was a good man and a rival expected to take his place.
A victim named Sandhimati or Samdimati. And a guru named
Issana who in my book is mostly an onlooker, but in Hassnain's book
travels "through the air" to find his crucified disciple, and
carries him back to India or the Kashmir area. With the
Muslim traditions of St. Issa and of a Jesus who sent someone else to be
crucified in his place, Hassnain understandibly confuses Issana with
Jesus, and has no idea who Sandhimati might be.
Crucifixion of Sandhimati
Kings of Kashmira
Jogesh Chunder Dutt's
Translation
Page
29 "(Vijaya) was succeeded by his son Jayendra of great fame, whose
long arms reached to his knees. He had a minister
named Sandhimati, a devout worshipper of Shiva; but the king led by his
flatterers suspected him of evil designs because of his great
wisdom. He was forbidden to approach the king, his property was
confiscated, and he was reduced to poverty for the rest of his
days. Nor was there any officer of the court who spoke to him, for
the courtiers are but echoes of the king. But neither the anger of the
king or his own poverty ruffled his temper; for still he passed his days
happily in the worship of his god."
"Even in
his devotions he was not suffered to remain in peace. There was a
rumour this time would come when Sandhimati would reign. His
enemies at court hinted to the king that the ex-minister had spread this
rumour; and the king, alarmed at the possible consequences, threw
Sandhimati into prison, chained with a heavy chain. There he
remained for ten years till the time of the king's death."
"When
the last days of the king approached, the pain of his illness was
aggravated by his fear that the imprisoned Sandhimati would succeed him,
as he was childless. And to remove his anxieties, he intended to
execute the minister. But however wisely man may contrive
for his good, it is in the power of Fate, to turn it to his evil.
If there be a spark of fire, and man wishes to put it out, and if Fate
would have it otherwise, the man mistakes the pot of melted ghee
(grease?) for water and pours it over the fire."
'Now
by the cruel king's order the executioners impaled Sandhimati in the
night, and when the king heard that the minister was dead, his heart
became light; but he died soon after. He reigned for thirty seven
years, and died without a child."
In
the margin of my copy of Kings of Kashmira was my
first clue to the identity of Sandhimati. Sue Olsson
had sent me her personal copy of this book, and written in the
margin next to this story of Sandhimati's crucifixion in blue
ball-point pen ink were these words by Sue --- "Sandhimati
could have been Joseph, who legend claims is buried nearby." It
was a wild guess on Sue's part, but I looked at the story up to
this point and saw parallels with the story of Joseph, son of
Israel in the Bible, and E-mailed Sue about these paralells.
Joseph ben
Israel was a minister to a king Sandhimati was
a minister to a king
Joseph ben
Israel was a godly
youth
Sandhimati was a devout man
Joseph ben
Israel was in prison for jealousy Sandhimati was
in prison for jealousy
Joseph ben Israel escaped
prison to reign Sandhimati was to do
likewise.
The story
of the Jewish Joseph was not however, well known in Kashmir.
Or was it? Sue let me know that lots of Jewish stories were
not only well known there, but that many inhabitants of Kashmir to
this very day consider themselves to be descendents of the lost
10 tribes of Israel! The solution to this riddle: Sandhimati
is Joseph!
As
I read on, the correspondence between the Biblical Joseph and
Sandhimati increased as Sandhimati becomes the well-dressed and
god-fearing king of Kashmir. |
As I look now
at this picture I have chosen to illustrate that someone who preserved
the history of Sandhimati in Kashmir wanted to show parallels between
him and the Biblical Joseph I can now see it illustrates a very obvious
point, Joseph was a white Jewish youth surrounded by black-skinned
Egyptian men. And if we are to believe what Chunder-Dutt has
placed in his king's list on page xx of his appendix, and again on page
vi in his history, an alias for Sandhimati was Aryyaraja. Roughly
translated that's the "White Rajah". (In
Hassnain's "A Search for the Historical Jesus" this
otherwise erudite scholar has taken this name "Aryyaraja" to
mean Sandhimati was not a King of Kashmir, but an "Aryan"
prince of another country. Page 192 "Kalhana states
that a great saint by the name of Issana lived at Issabar, on
the bank of Lake Dal in Kashmir. He had many disciples and the
chief among them was Samdimati, the prince of the Aryans. This
disciple was so great that in every house they said: To Samdimati
shall belong the kingdom!") The point is a similar one
whether we see Sandhimati as "Aryan" or a Kashmir Jew of the
"Lost Tribes of Israel" (to which Joseph supplied 2 tribes,
Ephriam and Manasseh,) --- he was pale-skinned and did not have typical
dark Indian skin and facial features!
Chunder-Dutt continues on page 31. "The kingdom was for a few days
left without a king. At last Sanhimati, [who, it appears, was
falsely reported to the king as dead,] was selected by the citizens to
reign over them (as was Joseph as prime minister under Pharaoh in the
Bible - RH); and he reluctantly, and only at the request of his guru,
ascended the throne."
"Dressed in royal clothes, and midst the shouts of his subjects who
scattered parched grain in his way, he entered the capital with his
army. An experienced man as he was, he governed wisely, without
being taught, and did everything in a perfect manner. [First
clue that Sandhimati was an Essene, those who were doing things in a
"perfect manner" in the Wilderness of Judea by the Dead Sea]. He
was not susceptible to the fascinations of women [Second
clue that Sandhimati was an Essene. The Essenes, as we have noted
before, were generally celibate, having as little to do with women as
possible.] and his reign was peaceful [Third clue that Sandhimati
was an Essene. Said Jesus in Matthew 5:9 "Blessed
are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God."].
But now we learn the terrible truth -- Joseph-Sandhimati is not a
worshipper of YHWH, the Jewish god, but of Lord Shiva, the Hindu
god!
"He
was ever pleased with burning incense and camphor; and though regular in
the discharge of regal duties, he would often go to visit different
Shivas, viz., Bhutesha Bardhamanisha Vijayesha and Ishana
and would feel pleasure even in breathing the air that blew from
the temple of Hara, bearing the particles of water with which the steps
of the temple were washed, or listening to the sound of the water as it
poured over the god. He alone knew the happiness which may
be derived from visiting the image
of Shiva, beautiful in its simplicity, and washed after the
morning service. Every day he made one thousand Shiva-lingas."
Shiva linga photographed by Suzanna Olsson.
Behind it on your left is
the obelisk that I am saying is a picture of Jesus as
Prince Meghavahana.
"If through any accident he failed to do this, he would order his
servants to collect a thousand stones in their stead; and after worship,
threw them into a tank or river that looked like Narmada; and such a
collection of stones is still to be seen."
Modern egg-shaped Shiva linga stones
are still made and sold from the Sacred River Narmada
Neither
Suzanna Olsson nor Fida Hassnain are great fans of Lord Shiva, and
Suzanna finds Shiva-lingas disgusting, so no wonder both read over
quotations such as the above with total incomprehension. I have,
however, the explanation. Sandhimati owed his life to Lord
Shiva. It was Lord Shiva who rescued him from death and brought
him back to life after he had been crucified! The first clue
is in the above quotation when Chunder Dutt lists "Ishana" as
one of the Shivas that Sandhimati went to worship repeatedly and
gladly Ishana, Issana, and Issana who lived at Issabar on
the banks of Lake Dal are all aliases of Lord Shiva. (Who also had so
many other names, I, as a westerner, can't really keep up with them.)
Shiva as
Ishana the
Guru
Once we equate
Lord Shiva (who often in these stories appears disguised as a hermit or
beggar, male or female) as the "Guru" of Sandhimati, we're on
the trail to solve all these riddles!
Chunder
Dutt's Kings of Kashmira Appendix, page iv-vi, "Sandhimati
died impaled (crucified) by the orders of his master, and his corpse was
thrown into the field where the dead were burnt; as had been stated in
the text. The story of his reviving is as follows: -- His
religious instructor named Ishana, though he was master of his passions
, was much afflicted to learn of his death, and went to that place to
perform the last ceremonies due to the remains of his pupil. '
"Here
he found the body fixed to the pale (pike), and reduced to skeleton, the
wolves having devoured the flesh; and the wind was passing through the
hole in his head."
"Ishana
began to weep as he disengaged the stick from the body; and driving back
the howling wolves, he dragged away the corpse from the place; the hair
of his late pupil covered with dust touched his feet. But when he
was going to perform the last ceremony, the following lines marked on
his forehead by Vidhata caught his eye: 'Poverty so long as he lives,
ten years' imprisonment, death on a pale, and then kingdom again.'
Seeing that the first three lines had agreed with the fact, he became
much anxious to know how the fourth would come to pass."
An internet picture of Vidhata, "Supreme
God", "God of the Whole World".
"He thought
that Fate was irresistible, and in spite of every opposition what was
writ by Fate must come to happen. (Some stories to illustrate
this). Saying all these to himself, he watched the skeleton in
hope to see it revive again."
"Now,
at midnight, while he was watching, his thoughts having driven sleep
away, he felt the smell of burning incense, and then he heard the loud
sound of drums. Soon after he saw Yoginis coming that way
with a burning light. They then got hold of the skeleton and ran
away with it."
Yoginis, some of which are pictured above, are
athletic (Yoga) female angels or goddesses
or human females who mimic their activities.
Sometimes starved for sex.
"Much astonished he ran after them sword in hand. He found
them among the trees, seated around the skeleton, and repairing
it. Each of them lent it a member of her own body, (note the
excess arms in some of the above photos) and having finished the whole,
they began to dance around it. The corpse then rose as from
a sleep, and each of them began to caress him for which purpose
they had brought him to life. (Sort of like a plastic male doll
from a modern adult superstore)."
"When the night began to wane (and we can assume the
"girls" had had enough fun with their "boy toy"),
Ishana feared that they would take back the members that they had
supplied, so he with a yell rushed into their circle. The Yoginis
fled at the same time bidding him not to fear, for they would not take
back the members they had given, nor would they themselves be
mutilated because of their gift; and assuring him that through
their blessings he would be king under the name of Aryyaraja."
[This also conveniently gives the
people a reason for Joseph's white skin other than he was Jewish.
The white skin of the light-skinned Yoginis.]"
Isha Natha
and
Chetan Natha
In
another story of crucifixion and resurrection on page 123 and 124 of "A
Search for the Historical Jesus" Fida Hassnain relates a story
he titles The Hindu Version of the Crucifixion. Hassnain is
quite certain that this is most likely referring to Jesus' crucifixion,
but in light of what I will tell you later, it could just as well refer
to Joseph, Jesus' father, which I have identified as Sandhimati in
Kashmir. In this story I am assuming that Lord Shiva has yet
another name, "Chetan Natha".
"An ancient Hindu sutra, known as "Natha-nama-vali",
a holy Sutra of the Nath Yogis, has given a different version about
the crucifixion of Jesus (Joseph?), whom they call Isha Natha.
Let me quote:
"Isha Natha came to India at the age of fourteen. After this
he returned to his own country and began preaching. Soon after,
his brutish and materialistic countrymen conspired against him and had
him crucified. After crucifixion, or perhaps even before it, Isha
Natha entered samadhi or profound trance, by means of yoga."
"Seeing him thus, the Jews presumed he was dead, and buried him in
a tomb. At that very moment however, one of his gurus or teachers,
the great Chetan Natha, happened to be in profound meditation, in the
lower reaches of the Himalayas, and he saw in vision the tortures
which Isha Natha was undergoing. He therefore made his body
lighter than air and passed over to the land of Israel."
"The day of his arrival was marked with thunder and lightning, for
the gods were angry with the Jews, and the whole world trembled.
When Chetan Natha arrived, he took the body of Isha Natha from the tomb,
woke him from his samadhi, and later led him off to the sacred land of
the Aryans. Isha Natha then established an ashram in the lower
regions of the Himalayas and he established the cult of the lingam and
the yoni there."
It doesn't matter here whether this refers to the crucifixion of
Sanhimati as Joseph, or the later crucifixion of his son Jesus in 33 AD,
10 years later, the point is that if a guru or god, be his name Ishana
or Chetan Natha (or his better known name Lord Shiva) was able to see,
as in this story, what was happening in Israel, and rescue one of these
two from death by crucifixion, a mere 10 years difference would not
impair him from doing it twice. Which is what I am going to
say happened. Not by Yogi tricks, but by means of the
superior communications and technology associated rightly with
space-craft.
Lord Shiva is quite commonly pictured with
space-craft, called Vimanas, and such
space-craft in modern times have good
communication and medical capabilities.
Those sighting space-craft in modern times, usually
describe them as saucer-shaped,
as in the picture below, and there are indeed, scores
or maybe hundreds of such pictures.
"It has become my studied conviction, after 30 years of
occasionally seeing "strange lights in the night" and two
day-time clearly visible "flying saucers", then becoming
proficient in several types of Bible Codes that support "Flying
Saucers" that they do indeed exist. And I have read many of
Zechariah Sitchin's books that support that we earthlings were created
by what amounts to "Heavenly Astronauts". So Lord
Shiva riding around in a flying saucer ferrying Jesus and his father
Joseph between Kashmir and Qumran does not in the least surprise
me. Nor should it surprise you, once you read these very
supportive stories. Jesus the pedestrian wearing down his sandals
getting educated in India, Nepal, and Tibet became Jesus the
"Space-craft Passenger", like his father Joseph had been, once
the time was right!
Victory over Death
Kings of Kashmira
Appendix vi
Sandhimati clothed in heavenly robes and garlands, and remembering the
facts before his death, bowed to his Guru. He, too, in
excess of delight embraced him whom he never hoped to see alive
again. They then, in wise conversation, began to discuss on the
worthlessness of the world. The citizens in the
meantime having learnt what had happened came to the spot, both
young and old, with the ministers of the State. They at
first doubted the identity of Sandhimati, but his speech dispelled their
doubts. The Brahmanas then bathed his newly received
heavenly body in the neighboring grove, and he entered the city
accompanied by his army."
Problems with Time
and Sequence
|
Even though I had followed Sue
Olsson's suggestion that Sabhimati might be Joseph the
father of Jesus, and found the parallelism in the Kashmir
story between Sandhimati and the Biblical Joseph, and
later in the story the evidence that he was an Essene, the
lack of any time codes in the Kashmir Sandhimati
story and an apparent sequence difficulty still had
me puzzled.
According to
the story, Sandhimati could not become king until after
the death of Jayendra. But Jayendra died in
Chunder Dutt's Kings List (Appendix) in 22
BC, and Sandhimati reigned for 47 years, until 25
AD. And I had discovered in the Essene "Pesher"
history that Josephi was executed in 23 AD. |
The period between 18 AD and 25
AD (7 years) is critical to my theory that Sanhimati was called
"Joseph the Essene" at Qumran and in the Judean Desert,
while still remaining King of Kashmir and commuting between Kashmir
and Qumran in Lord Shiva's Vimana. Either the Kashmir historians
have misplaced the time that Sandhimati was crucified, or they have
mistakenly connected it to the ending of Jayanta's reign. I
suspect the latter is true. There may have been bad feelings
of Jayanta for Sandhimati, but that former king never had Sandhimati
crucified. The Romans crucified Joseph on one of
his escapades as an Essene "Messiah" after Lord Shiva had
ferried him to Judea at the Kashmir King's request. Lord
Shiva was watching as the King was crucified, snatched him still
alive from the Roman cross, and repaired his injuries, possibly on
the space ship. Some restorative surgery, some IV's and
antibiotics, and (almost) good as new. But not quite.
Sandhimati suffered some irreparable brain damage. And the
people of Kashmir noticed, 2 years before he retired, that he had
become quite ineffective as an administrator. This change
corresponds to the real date of Sandhimati's crucifixion and Lord
Shiva's (partial) repairs.
|
|